“HPV, Pointless Tests & Toxic Shots” by Dr. Sam Bailey: Transcription and Translation into Latvian
[00:06.000 –> 00:14.000] They claim that it is affecting people everywhere, whether it be in the form of warts or cervical abnormalities, including cancer.
[00:14.000 –> 00:20.000] They claim that it passes around through skin and sexual contact with the greatest of ease.
[00:20.000 –> 00:27.000] And the end response from the medico-pharmaceutical industry to this alleged virus has been vaccines of course.
[00:27.000 –> 00:30.080] Let’s have a look at the mainstream world of HPV
[00:30.080 –> 00:33.840] to see how an imaginary particle has been blamed
[00:33.840 –> 00:36.240] for conditions that have other causes.
[00:36.240 –> 00:39.240] You can’t catch it through skin or sexual contact
[00:39.240 –> 00:41.000] because there is no it.
[00:41.000 –> 00:45.800] So how and why are children and adolescents
[00:45.800 –> 00:49.200] around the world being injected with a vaccine
[00:49.200 –> 00:51.200] for something that doesn’t exist?
[00:57.000 –> 01:13.320] The United States CDC states that HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection.
[01:13.320 –> 01:20.040] There were about 43 million HPV infections in 2018, many among people in their late teens
[01:20.040 –> 01:21.760] and early twenties.
[01:21.760 –> 01:24.020] There are many different types of HPV.
[01:24.020 –> 01:29.600] Some types can cause health problems including genital warts and cancers, but there are vaccines
[01:29.600 –> 01:32.560] that can stop these health problems from happening.
[01:32.560 –> 01:38.120] In reality, there is no scientific study that provides any direct evidence of an infectious
[01:38.120 –> 01:40.480] process taking place between humans.
[01:40.480 –> 01:47.680] Hence, blaming warts and cancers on imagined viruses and contagion will not help with understanding
[01:47.680 –> 01:49.240] these problems.
[01:49.240 –> 01:54.700] HPV is one of those quote viruses like herpes where the medical establishment
[01:54.700 –> 02:00.420] claims that virtually everyone has it. It is being spread around relentlessly most
[02:00.420 –> 02:05.380] of the time not causing much harm but sometimes it can lead to your death.
[02:05.380 –> 02:11.900] As the CDC goes on to say in most cases 9 out of 10 HPV goes away on its own
[02:11.900 –> 02:17.060] within two years without health problems but when HPV does not go away it can
[02:17.060 –> 02:20.460] cause health problems like genital warts and cancer.
[02:20.460 –> 02:25.540] In other words, a ubiquitous scapegoat that can be blamed even though on their own terms
[02:25.540 –> 02:30.900] they’ll admit that the vast majority of the time it is quote found, it doesn’t cause these
[02:30.900 –> 02:31.900] diseases.
[02:31.900 –> 02:38.020] However, this circular reasoning is commenced when the CDC reports that there is no test
[02:38.020 –> 02:41.580] to find out a person’s HPV status.
[02:41.580 –> 02:45.820] So if that’s the case, how is it diagnosed?
[02:45.820 –> 02:50.820] Disinformation site Wikipedia reports that genital warts are the only visible
[02:50.820 –> 02:57.060] sign of low-risk genital HPV and can be identified with a visual check.
[02:57.060 –> 03:02.780] In other words the condition, a wart, is conflated with evidence of a quote virus
[03:02.780 –> 03:08.940] even though they have no test. The CDC do however claim that there are HPV tests
[03:08.940 –> 03:14.420] that can screen for cervical cancer. Once again a condition, cancer, is being
[03:14.420 –> 03:19.140] conflated with a supposed virus and what is the evidence for these claims?
[03:19.140 –> 03:24.820] At this point we can look to a 2015 publication in the journal of clinical virology titled
[03:24.820 –> 03:31.060] HBV testing for primary cervical screening. Of note they reported that the HBV assays
[03:31.060 –> 03:38.180] used in the trials were the Hybrid Capture 2, HC2, and the General Primer 5-6 PCR EIA.
[03:38.820 –> 03:42.340] Both of these tests are molecular detection tests.
[03:42.340 –> 03:46.580] They do not require the existence of viruses to give a positive result.
[03:46.580 –> 03:55.980] The Hybrid Capture 2 assay uses RNA probes to hybridize or join with similar DNA sequences that are claimed to come from HPV.
[03:55.980 –> 04:04.820] And then an antibody, said to be specific to these hybrids, is employed with a luminescent reaction to indicate its presence.
(whisper311) dainismichel@z1 ~ % python -m whisper “/Users/dainismichel/Downloads/sam-bailey-audio-hpv.wav” \
–model medium.en –language en –task transcribe \
–output_dir “/Users/dainismichel/Downloads” \
–output_format txt –temperature 0 \
–condition_on_previous_text False –word_timestamps False \
–initial_prompt “Female New Zealand English speaker.”
/Users/dainismichel/venvs/whisper311/lib/python3.11/site-packages/whisper/transcribe.py:132: UserWarning: FP16 is not supported on CPU; using FP32 instead
warnings.warn(“FP16 is not supported on CPU; using FP32 instead”)
[00:00.000 –> 00:06.000] Human papillomavirus, or HBV, is one of the big ones within the world of virology.
[00:06.000 –> 00:14.000] They claim that it is affecting people everywhere, whether it be in the form of warts or cervical abnormalities, including cancer.
[00:14.000 –> 00:20.000] They claim that it passes around through skin and sexual contact with the greatest of ease.
[00:20.000 –> 00:27.000] And the end response from the medico-pharmaceutical industry to this alleged virus has been vaccines of course.
[00:27.000 –> 00:30.080] Let’s have a look at the mainstream world of HPV
[00:30.080 –> 00:33.840] to see how an imaginary particle has been blamed
[00:33.840 –> 00:36.240] for conditions that have other causes.
[00:36.240 –> 00:39.240] You can’t catch it through skin or sexual contact
[00:39.240 –> 00:41.000] because there is no it.
[00:41.000 –> 00:45.800] So how and why are children and adolescents
[00:45.800 –> 00:49.200] around the world being injected with a vaccine
[00:49.200 –> 00:51.200] for something that doesn’t exist?
[00:57.000 –> 01:13.320] The United States CDC states that HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection.
[01:13.320 –> 01:20.040] There were about 43 million HPV infections in 2018, many among people in their late teens
[01:20.040 –> 01:21.760] and early twenties.
[01:21.760 –> 01:24.020] There are many different types of HPV.
[01:24.020 –> 01:29.600] Some types can cause health problems including genital warts and cancers, but there are vaccines
[01:29.600 –> 01:32.560] that can stop these health problems from happening.
[01:32.560 –> 01:38.120] In reality, there is no scientific study that provides any direct evidence of an infectious
[01:38.120 –> 01:40.480] process taking place between humans.
[01:40.480 –> 01:47.680] Hence, blaming warts and cancers on imagined viruses and contagion will not help with understanding
[01:47.680 –> 01:49.240] these problems.
[01:49.240 –> 01:54.700] HPV is one of those quote viruses like herpes where the medical establishment
[01:54.700 –> 02:00.420] claims that virtually everyone has it. It is being spread around relentlessly most
[02:00.420 –> 02:05.380] of the time not causing much harm but sometimes it can lead to your death.
[02:05.380 –> 02:11.900] As the CDC goes on to say in most cases 9 out of 10 HPV goes away on its own
[02:11.900 –> 02:17.060] within two years without health problems but when HPV does not go away it can
[02:17.060 –> 02:20.460] cause health problems like genital warts and cancer.
[02:20.460 –> 02:25.540] In other words, a ubiquitous scapegoat that can be blamed even though on their own terms
[02:25.540 –> 02:30.900] they’ll admit that the vast majority of the time it is quote found, it doesn’t cause these
[02:30.900 –> 02:31.900] diseases.
[02:31.900 –> 02:38.020] However, this circular reasoning is commenced when the CDC reports that there is no test
[02:38.020 –> 02:41.580] to find out a person’s HPV status.
[02:41.580 –> 02:45.820] So if that’s the case, how is it diagnosed?
[02:45.820 –> 02:50.820] Disinformation site Wikipedia reports that genital warts are the only visible
[02:50.820 –> 02:57.060] sign of low-risk genital HPV and can be identified with a visual check.
[02:57.060 –> 03:02.780] In other words the condition, a wart, is conflated with evidence of a quote virus
[03:02.780 –> 03:08.940] even though they have no test. The CDC do however claim that there are HPV tests
[03:08.940 –> 03:14.420] that can screen for cervical cancer. Once again a condition, cancer, is being
[03:14.420 –> 03:19.140] conflated with a supposed virus and what is the evidence for these claims?
[03:19.140 –> 03:24.820] At this point we can look to a 2015 publication in the journal of clinical virology titled
[03:24.820 –> 03:31.060] HBV testing for primary cervical screening. Of note they reported that the HBV assays
[03:31.060 –> 03:38.180] used in the trials were the Hybrid Capture 2, HC2, and the General Primer 5-6 PCR EIA.
[03:38.820 –> 03:42.340] Both of these tests are molecular detection tests.
[03:42.340 –> 03:46.340] They do not require the existence of viruses to give a positive result.
[03:46.340 –> 03:53.940] The Hybrid Capture 2 assay uses RNA probes to hybridize or join with similar DNA sequences
[03:53.940 –> 03:55.940] that are claimed to come from HPV.
[03:55.940 –> 04:00.540] And then an antibody, said to be specific to these hybrids,
[04:00.540 –> 04:04.740] is employed with a luminescent reaction to indicate its presence.
[04:04.740 –> 04:08.740] The PCR, which many of you are familiar with by now,
[04:08.740 –> 04:14.240] simply amplifies DNA sequences said to be HPV-specific.
[04:14.240 –> 04:18.540] However, in this case, to aid their genetic fishing expedition,
[04:18.540 –> 04:23.240] they report that general or consensus prima mediated PCR assays
[04:23.240 –> 04:29.240] have been developed to detect a broad spectrum of genital HPV genotypes in one PCR.
[04:29.240 –> 04:35.440] In other words, many different DNA sequence variations can cause a positive reaction,
[04:35.440 –> 04:41.040] with their reasoning being that these represent the variance of the imagined virus.
[04:41.040 –> 04:45.340] It is another example of the virologists circular reasoning.
[04:45.340 –> 04:49.540] They are claiming that these genetic sequences come from inside viruses
[04:49.540 –> 04:55.540] and therefore detecting these sequences means they have evidence of viruses.
[04:55.540 –> 05:02.340] What is missing is the steps that show the actual existence of infectious particles
[05:02.340 –> 05:06.840] and that the sequences come from inside such particles.
[05:06.840 –> 05:11.640] The virologists logical fallacy has been pointed out for decades.
[05:11.640 –> 05:17.540] For example, since the 1990s, the Perth group have shown that claimed
[05:17.540 –> 05:23.540] quote HIV sequences were never shown to come from the proposed HIV particles.
[05:23.540 –> 05:28.740] In recent years many more of us have pointed out the same issue with SARS-CoV-2
[05:28.740 –> 05:30.340] among other logical gaps.
[05:30.340 –> 05:36.520] The claimed virus does not exist as the assembled sequences have never been shown to be viral in nature.
[05:36.960 –> 05:38.960] With HPV it is no different.
[05:38.960 –> 05:45.320] There is no demonstration of the sequences coming from an entity that meets the definition of a virus.
[05:45.640 –> 05:51.900] By all accounts, they are simply variations of genetic sequences found in human tissue.
[05:51.900 –> 05:56.400] It is a problem we encounter with everyone who claims that disease-causing viruses exist.
[05:56.400 –> 06:10.200] They want to start the conversation with the false premise that genetic databases contain evidence of viruses and that their phylogenetic trees show variants and evolving pathogens.
[06:10.200 –> 06:13.600] However, it is a paradigm of fictional constructs.
[06:13.600 –> 06:24.400] In A Farewell to Virology, His Formal Refutation of the Virus model, my husband Mark used the example of SARS-CoV-2 to expose the fraud.
[06:24.400 –> 06:30.400] In the section, Turtles All the Way Down, he outlined how the trail of quote coronavirus
[06:30.400 –> 06:36.160] genomes leads back to publications in the 1980s that provide no evidence that the genetic
[06:36.160 –> 06:40.140] sequences are viral in provenance, just like HPV.
[06:40.140 –> 06:43.920] But what about those pictures claiming to show evidence of HPV?
[06:43.920 –> 06:50.120] For example, in 1990, a team of researchers obtained surgically removed warts, which were
[06:50.120 –> 06:52.920] which were then homogenized and ultra-centrifuged.
[06:52.920 –> 06:56.240] An electron micrograph image is shown in Figure 1,
[06:56.240 –> 06:59.920] which they claim represents, quote, purified HPV.
[06:59.920 –> 07:04.220] But were these alleged particles shown to be infectious or disease-causing?
[07:04.220 –> 07:05.220] No.
[07:05.220 –> 07:09.020] They were claimed to be viral on the basis of DNA sequences
[07:09.020 –> 07:11.220] detected through hybridization,
[07:11.220 –> 07:13.520] the problem of which I’ve just discussed.
[07:13.520 –> 07:18.220] They engaged in further circular reasoning with electron microscopy antibody reactions,
[07:18.220 –> 07:20.720] claim to be specific to HPV.
[07:20.720 –> 07:24.720] We can see that even on their own terms they have a problem here
[07:24.720 –> 07:29.220] because in their control group, said not to have warts,
[07:29.220 –> 07:34.720] half of the adult subjects also had positive antibody reactions in their blood samples.
[07:34.720 –> 07:38.220] They disingenuously included some infants
[07:38.220 –> 07:40.720] who were all without positive antibody tests
[07:40.720 –> 07:43.720] in an attempt to make the figures look better.
[07:43.720 –> 07:46.220] This is an invalid comparison.
[07:46.220 –> 07:49.880] as the youngest patients in the WART group were 9 year olds.
[07:49.880 –> 07:55.880] Besides the fact that there is no way that these antibody assays show specificity,
[07:55.880 –> 07:59.680] even on their own terms, there is another issue with the study.
[07:59.680 –> 08:03.180] If they purported to show viruses from the WART samples,
[08:03.180 –> 08:06.680] where were the comparative electron micrographs?
[08:06.680 –> 08:11.980] That is, samples taken from healthy skin and skin with other diseases.
[08:11.980 –> 08:16.980] When we go back to the method section where they describe patients and control subjects,
[08:16.980 –> 08:23.580] we see that control sera were collected from 6 healthy infants aged 6 to 12 months,
[08:23.580 –> 08:27.580] and from 18 laboratory workers aged 25 to 59 years.
[08:27.580 –> 08:34.180] In other words, they only took blood samples for comparison, not skin samples.
[08:34.180 –> 08:41.080] So they didn’t check if particles that looked the same could also be found in the absence of warts.
[08:41.080 –> 08:46.280] So you can see that there is layer upon layer of missing evidence here.
[08:46.280 –> 08:50.400] Even if the visualized particles are related to warts,
[08:50.400 –> 08:55.360] there is no evidence that they are the causative element.
[08:55.360 –> 08:58.240] In particular, being viral in nature.
[08:58.240 –> 09:02.520] Similarly, if the detected DNA sequences relate to disease,
[09:02.520 –> 09:05.280] whether it be in warts or cervical cancer,
[09:05.280 –> 09:09.960] there is again no evidence that such sequences are viral in origin.
[09:09.960 –> 09:17.100] And the antibody assays are so non-specific that they are farcical, even on their own terms.
[09:17.100 –> 09:21.900] When we go back to the HPV testing for primary cervical screening publication,
[09:21.900 –> 09:25.860] it states that for cervical screening and disease management,
[09:25.860 –> 09:31.260] the priority is for detection of infections associated with lesions or lesion development.
[09:31.260 –> 09:39.900] Hence, the HPV test is not strictly a viral test where high analytical sensitivity is prized.
[09:39.900 –> 09:42.760] but rather a test for oncogenic risk.
[09:42.760 –> 09:46.560] This sort of sentence may impress those that are
[09:46.560 –> 09:49.360] naive to the fraud of virology,
[09:49.360 –> 09:53.220] but can be rejected as a scientific sleight of hand.
[09:53.220 –> 09:59.320] The HBV test is not strictly a viral test should read
[09:59.320 –> 10:03.560] The HBV test is not and never was a viral test.
[10:03.560 –> 10:08.160] A so-called viral test has to go beyond analytical sensitivity
[10:08.160 –> 10:12.660] and specificity for genetic sequences or some other alleged correlation.
[10:12.660 –> 10:16.460] However, that can’t be done because there’s no evidence of the thing
[10:16.460 –> 10:18.960] that they are purporting to validate the sequence against.
[10:18.960 –> 10:22.960] That is, an actual infectious HPV particle.
[10:22.960 –> 10:27.460] In chapter 8 of Virus Mania, with regard to cervical cancer
[10:27.460 –> 10:29.760] and the supposed existence of HPV,
[10:29.760 –> 10:33.760] we outlined the questions we put to the DKFZ,
[10:33.760 –> 10:37.160] known in English as the German Cancer Research Center.
[10:37.160 –> 10:39.200] We wrote,
[10:39.200 –> 10:42.700] Can we really believe the methods of virus detection?
[10:42.700 –> 10:47.600] The DKFZ sent us a quote, wonderful literature list,
[10:47.600 –> 10:51.760] in which there were two studies both conducted by Zuhausen et al.
[10:51.760 –> 10:58.360] that they claim serve as proofs for the first isolation of specific HPV from cervical cancer tissue.
[10:58.360 –> 11:05.060] The first of these two papers published in 1983 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
[11:05.060 –> 11:08.860] a papillomavirus DNA from a cervical carcinoma
[11:08.860 –> 11:13.260] and its prevalence in cancer biopsy samples from different geographic regions
[11:13.260 –> 11:16.060] lacks the following critical issues.
[11:16.060 –> 11:21.660] It is not clear where the cloned DNA of the presumed virus comes from.
[11:21.660 –> 11:24.460] Without knowing the origin of the DNA,
[11:24.460 –> 11:27.460] it is impossible to prove that a virus was there.
[11:27.460 –> 11:31.660] A large number of cervical tumors were screened without success,
[11:31.660 –> 11:37.200] Increasing the possibility that the discovery of one tumor with this DNA is just a coincidence.
[11:37.200 –> 11:40.820] The authors use the term non-stringent conditions,
[11:40.820 –> 11:45.860] which probably means that hybridization occurred with less than a perfect match.
[11:45.860 –> 11:50.760] That is to say, the two DNA strands they were using were not identical.
[11:50.760 –> 11:55.780] Of course, they would just say that viruses mutate rapidly, David Crow points out.
[11:55.780 –> 11:57.760] But this is pure speculation.
[11:57.760 –> 12:02.260] We highlighted several other concerns to the DKFZ
[12:02.260 –> 12:05.860] about these claimed foundational HPV papers
[12:05.860 –> 12:09.760] and asked them for clarification, but they never responded.
[12:09.760 –> 12:13.760] And even if they sincerely believe that HPV exists,
[12:13.760 –> 12:18.060] the claim that it causes cervical cancer is preposterous.
[12:18.060 –> 12:22.560] Within their own paradigm, the epidemiology reveals
[12:22.560 –> 12:26.960] that only around 0.1% of the women said to be
[12:26.960 –> 12:31.960] quote, infected with HPV, end up developing cervical cancer.
[12:31.960 –> 12:36.460] So it’s little wonder that the CDC states there is no way to know
[12:36.460 –> 12:39.960] who will develop cancer or other health problems from HPV.
[12:39.960 –> 12:45.160] Those of us that have seen through the methodologies of the virologists
[12:45.160 –> 12:50.360] can help them with their dilemma and point out that exactly none of them
[12:50.360 –> 12:54.960] will get these conditions from a fictional invention that has no basis in science.
[12:54.960 –> 13:01.460] At this point we can see that they have no evidence that a particle that meets the description of a virus actually exists.
[13:01.460 –> 13:09.660] If the particle has not been shown to exist, there can be no way to validate any tests said to detect such a particle.
[13:09.660 –> 13:15.960] Thus there can be no way to show anyone is quote infected with these particles,
[13:15.960 –> 13:19.960] or that they spread between humans, or that they cause any health problems.
[13:19.960 –> 13:25.300] Unfortunately, most people won’t look into any of this, and instead say,
[13:25.300 –> 13:30.260] yes, but there’s a vaccine, so how could they make a vaccine without a virus?
[13:30.260 –> 13:34.960] This is the oldest trick in the book, and has been cited since Edward Jenner published
[13:34.960 –> 13:42.460] an inquiry into the causes and effects of the varial vaccine, or cowpox, in 1798.
[13:42.460 –> 13:46.760] As Mike Stone wrote in his comprehensive article on Jenner’s activities,
[13:46.760 –> 13:48.760] which I’ll link in the show notes.
[13:48.760 –> 13:51.460] These inoculations entail taking the pus
[13:51.460 –> 13:54.260] from the infected scabs of people suffering cowpox,
[13:54.260 –> 13:57.960] cutting open the skin of a healthy subject with a lancet,
[13:57.960 –> 14:01.260] and spreading this impure material into the wound.
[14:01.260 –> 14:03.760] If they were to develop disease and recover,
[14:03.760 –> 14:07.260] they would then be considered immune to smallpox.
[14:07.260 –> 14:11.260] HPV vaccines are based on more sophisticated biotechnology,
[14:11.260 –> 14:14.760] although the same filthy practice of injecting
[14:14.760 –> 14:17.880] disease-related products into the body remains.
[14:17.880 –> 14:20.500] Pharmaceuticals such as the Gardasil vaccine
[14:20.500 –> 14:25.220] contain various proteins that are alleged to come from HPV particles.
[14:25.220 –> 14:29.100] For the same reasons I’ve just gone over with regard to DNA sequences,
[14:29.100 –> 14:31.300] this is a fraudulent claim,
[14:31.300 –> 14:34.980] as these proteins have never been shown to belong to any virus.
[14:34.980 –> 14:39.380] Mainstream theory claims that these antigenic proteins in the vaccine
[14:39.380 –> 14:41.760] will prime the quote immune system
[14:41.760 –> 14:45.020] to defend itself against the supposed viruses in the future.
[14:45.020 –> 14:49.480] In reality, the injection will cause an inflammatory response,
[14:49.480 –> 14:51.980] which is the last thing the body needs.
[14:51.980 –> 14:57.980] As if it is not foolish enough to inject unwanted foreign proteins into the body,
[14:57.980 –> 15:03.860] Gardasil comes with extra toxicity in the form of 500 micrograms of aluminium,
[15:03.860 –> 15:07.060] or as our U.S. friends say, aluminum.
[15:07.060 –> 15:12.200] Aluminium is a heavy metal and the human body has no need for any.
[15:12.200 –> 15:17.300] The reason that it is added to vaccines is due to the claim that it generates a stronger
[15:17.300 –> 15:19.200] quote immune response.
[15:19.200 –> 15:24.040] I’ll address why this is a euphemism for what actually happens in an upcoming video
[15:24.040 –> 15:27.400] focusing on aluminium and vaccines.
[15:27.400 –> 15:32.240] It is bad enough to ingest aluminium from contaminated environmental sources,
[15:32.240 –> 15:36.340] but it is far worse to be injected with aluminium,
[15:36.340 –> 15:39.840] as it bypasses some of the body’s clearance mechanisms.
[15:39.840 –> 15:46.040] In fact, even the US Department of Health and Human Services 2008 publication,
[15:46.040 –> 15:48.940] Toxicological Profile for Aluminium,
[15:48.940 –> 15:53.940] states that gastrointestinal absorption of aluminium is low,
[15:53.940 –> 15:58.440] generally in the range of 0.1 to 0.4% in humans.
[15:58.440 –> 16:01.840] So more than 99% of it is not absorbed
[16:01.840 –> 16:04.340] and passes straight out in the faeces.
[16:04.340 –> 16:12.340] On the other hand, most of the injected aluminium will end up being sequestered into the brain and bones,
[16:12.340 –> 16:18.340] potentially setting up time bombs in these areas for the later manifestation of disease.
[16:18.340 –> 16:22.340] Combined with other vaccines on many childhood schedules,
[16:22.340 –> 16:30.340] it is apparent that Gardasil has added further toxicity and the cumulative aluminium burden.
[16:30.340 –> 16:37.340] Most parents have no idea, of course, that they are subjecting their children to such heavy metal poisoning.
[16:37.340 –> 16:43.340] So this is the end result in the story that has been created around HPV.
[16:43.340 –> 16:52.340] A toxic vaccine foisted onto an unsuspecting population for a quote virus that has never been shown to exist.
[16:52.340 –> 16:55.340] Warts are almost universally self-limiting.
[16:55.340 –> 16:59.840] And to be frank, I’m yet to see a good explanation for their cause.
[16:59.840 –> 17:04.640] It may simply be the body’s way of walling off an unwanted toxin.
[17:04.640 –> 17:09.640] We know from animal studies in which, quote, papillomaviruses are blamed,
[17:09.640 –> 17:14.640] that warty lesions are only induced by traumatizing the skin first.
[17:14.640 –> 17:19.640] At the end of the day, despite all the various treatments employed against warts,
[17:19.640 –> 17:21.640] they tend to resolve themselves.
[17:21.640 –> 17:27.640] With regard to cervical cancer, the fictional HPV is certainly not the cause.
[17:27.640 –> 17:34.200] But even those who believe there is such a virus cannot demonstrate internal consistency with their own model.
[17:34.200 –> 17:38.600] I’ll dedicate a future video to the topic of cervical cancer,
[17:38.600 –> 17:44.520] as well as the misleading smear tests which result in all sorts of unnecessary interventions.
[17:44.520 –> 17:52.200] With any of these health topics, your best bet is not to fight disease, but to practice good health.
[17:52.200 –> 17:58.300] In this regard you can check out all the resources we provide for free at drsambailey.com
[17:58.300 –> 18:04.300] Please also consider securing a copy of my book Terrain Therapy for comprehensive information
[18:04.300 –> 18:08.400] about not only avoiding medical tests and vaccines, but so much more.
[18:08.400 –> 18:12.400] Right thinking and right living is within everyone’s reach
[18:12.400 –> 18:15.300] and I hope you’ll continue on this journey with me.
[18:22.200 –> 18:28.900] Good night.
References
- “Genital HPV Infection – Basic Fact Sheet”, CDC
- “Human papillomavirus infection”, Wikipedia
- “HPV testing for primary cervical screening: Laboratory issues and evolving requirements for robust quality assurance”, Journal of Clinical Virology, 2015
- “A General Primer GP51/GP61-Mediated PCR-Enzyme Immunoassay Method for Rapid Detection of 14 High-Risk and 6 Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Cervical Scrapings”, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1997
- The Perth Group
- “A Farewell To Virology (Expert Edition)”, Dr Mark Bailey, 2022
- “Presence and type specificity of papillomavirus antibodies demonstrable by immunoelectron microscopy tests in samples from patients with warts”, Journal of General Virology, 1990
- Virus Mania, 3rd English Edition, 2021
- “Edward Jenner’s Smallpox Paper (1798)”, Mike Stone, 2022
- “GARDASIL®9 (Human Papillomavirus 9-valent Vaccine, Recombinant) Suspension for intramuscular injection”
- “Toxicology Profile For Aluminum”, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, 2008
- “Aluminum in Vaccines: History and Toxicity.”, thinklovehealthy, 2017
- Terrain Therapy, 2022
Automātisks tulkojums:
[00:00.000 –> 00:06.000] Cilvēka papilomas vīruss jeb HPV ir viens no lielākajiem viroloģijas pasaules spēlētājiem.[00:06.000 –> 00:14.000] Viņi apgalvo, ka tas ietekmē cilvēkus visur, vai nu kārpu vai dzemdes kakla anomāliju veidā, ieskaitot vēzi.
[00:14.000 –> 00:20.000] Viņi apgalvo, ka tas izplatās caur ādu un seksuālu kontaktu ar vislielāko vieglību.
[00:20.000 –> 00:27.000] Un medikāli farmaceitiskās industijas galīgā atbilde uz šo it kā vīrusu ir, protams, vakcīnas.
[00:27.000 –> 00:30.080] Apskatīsim HPV galvenās strāvas pasauli,
[00:30.080 –> 00:33.840] lai redzētu, kā iedomāta daļiņa ir tikusi apsūdzēta
[00:33.840 –> 00:36.240] par stāvokļiem, kuriem ir citi cēloņi.
[00:36.240 –> 00:39.240] Jūs nevarat to noķert caur ādu vai seksuālu kontaktu,
[00:39.240 –> 00:41.000] jo nav nekāda “tas”.
[00:41.000 –> 00:45.800] Tātad kā un kāpēc bērniem un pusaudžiem
[00:45.800 –> 00:49.200] visā pasaulē tiek ievadīta vakcīna
[00:49.200 –> 00:51.200] pret kaut ko, kas neeksistē?
[00:57.000 –> 01:13.320] Amerikas Savienoto Valstu CDC norāda, ka HPV ir visbiežākā seksuāli transmisīvā infekcija.
[01:13.320 –> 01:20.040] 2018. gadā bija aptuveni 43 miljoni HPV infekciju, daudzas starp cilvēkiem vēlīnajos pusaudžu gados
[01:20.040 –> 01:21.760] un agrīnajos divdesmitajos.
[01:21.760 –> 01:24.020] Ir daudzi dažādi HPV tipi.
[01:24.020 –> 01:29.600] Daži tipi var izraisīt veselības problēmas, ieskaitot dzimumorgānu kārpas un vēzi, bet ir vakcīnas,
[01:29.600 –> 01:32.560] kas var novērst šo veselības problēmu rašanos.
[01:32.560 –> 01:38.120] Realitātē nav zinātnisku pētījumu, kas sniegtu tiešus pierādījumus infekciozam
[01:38.120 –> 01:40.480] procesam, kas norisinās starp cilvēkiem.
[01:40.480 –> 01:47.680] Tāpēc kārpu un vēža vaināšana uz iedomātiem vīrusiem un infekciju nepalīdzēs izprast
[01:47.680 –> 01:49.240] šīs problēmas.
[01:49.240 –> 01:54.700] HPV ir viens no tiem citētajiem vīrusiem līdzīgi herpesam, par kuriem medicīnas aprindas
[01:54.700 –> 02:00.420] apgalvo, ka tas ir praktiski ikvienam. Tas izplatās neatlaidīgi lielāko
[02:00.420 –> 02:05.380] daļu laika, nenodarot daudz kaitējuma, bet dažreiz tas var novest pie nāves.
[02:05.380 –> 02:11.900] Kā CDC turpina teikt, lielākajā daļā gadījumu 9 no 10 HPV pazūd pats no sevis
[02:11.900 –> 02:17.060] divu gadu laikā bez veselības problēmām, bet kad HPV neizzūd, tas var
[02:17.060 –> 02:20.460] izraisīt veselības problēmas kā dzimumorgānu kārpas un vēzi.
[02:20.460 –> 02:25.540] Citiem vārdiem, visuresoša mēģenāža, ko var vaināt, lai gan pēc viņu paša noteikumiem
[02:25.540 –> 02:30.900] viņi atzīst, ka milzīgi lielāko daļu laika, kad tas citēti tiek atrasts, tas neizraisa šīs
[02:30.900 –> 02:31.900] slimības.
[02:31.900 –> 02:38.020] Tomēr šis apļveida argumentācijas sākums ir tad, kad CDC ziņo, ka nav testa,
[02:38.020 –> 02:41.580] lai noskaidrotu personas HPV statusu.
[02:41.580 –> 02:45.820] Tātad, ja tas tā ir, kā to diagnosticē?
[02:45.820 –> 02:50.820] Dezinformācijas vietne Wikipedia ziņo, ka dzimumorgānu kārpas ir vienīgā redzamā
[02:50.820 –> 02:57.060] zema riska dzimumorgānu HPV pazīme un tās var identificēt ar vizuālu pārbaudi.
[02:57.060 –> 03:02.780] Citiem vārdiem, stāvoklis, kārpa, tiek sajaukts ar citēta vīrusa
[03:02.780 –> 03:08.940] pierādījumiem, lai gan viņiem nav testa. CDC tomēr apgalvo, ka ir HPV testi,
[03:08.940 –> 03:14.420] kas var skrīnēt dzemdes kakla vēzi. Atkal stāvoklis, vēzis, tiek
[03:14.420 –> 03:19.140] sajaukts ar idomātu vīrusu, un kādi ir pierādījumi šiem apgalvojumiem?
[03:19.140 –> 03:24.820] Šajā brīdī mēs varam apskatīt 2015. gada publikāciju žurnālā Clinical Virology ar nosaukumu
[03:24.820 –> 03:31.060] “HPV testēšana primārajam dzemdes kakla skrīningam”. Jāatzīmē, ka viņi ziņoja, ka HPV analīzes,
[03:31.060 –> 03:38.180] kas tika izmantotas pētījumos, bija Hybrid Capture 2, HC2, un General Primer 5-6 PCR EIA.
[03:38.820 –> 03:42.340] Abi šie testi ir molekulārās detekcijas testi.
[03:42.340 –> 03:46.340] Tie neprasa vīrusu eksistenci, lai sniegtu pozitīvu rezultātu.
[03:46.340 –> 03:53.940] Hybrid Capture 2 analīze izmanto RNS zondas, lai hibridizētos jeb savienotos ar līdzīgām DNS sekvencēm,
[03:53.940 –> 03:55.940] kas it kā nāk no HPV.
[03:55.940 –> 04:00.540] Un tad antivielā, kas it kā ir specifiska šiem hibridiem,
[04:00.540 –> 04:04.740] tiek izmantota ar luminiscējošu reakciju, lai norādītu tās klātbūtni.
[04:04.740 –> 04:08.740] PCR, ar kuru daudzi no jums tagad esat iepazinušies,
[04:08.740 –> 04:14.240] vienkārši pastiprina DNS sekvences, kas it kā ir HPV specifiskas.
[04:14.240 –> 04:18.540] Tomēr šajā gadījumā, lai palīdzētu viņu ģenētiskajā zvejošanas ekspedīcijā,
[04:18.540 –> 04:23.240] viņi ziņo, ka vispārējas jeb konsensa primera vadītas PCR analīzes
[04:23.240 –> 04:29.240] ir izstrādātas, lai atklātu plašu dzimumorgānu HPV genotipu spektru vienā PCR.
[04:29.240 –> 04:35.440] Citiem vārdiem, daudzi dažādi DNS secības varianti var izraisīt pozitīvu reakciju
[04:35.440 –> 04:41.040] ar viņu argumentāciju, ka tie pārstāv iedomātā vīrusa variācijas.
[04:41.040 –> 04:45.340] Tas ir vēl viens virologu apļveida argumentācijas piemērs.
[04:45.340 –> 04:49.540] Viņi apgalvo, ka šīs ģenētiskās sekvences nāk no vīrusu iekšpuses
[04:49.540 –> 04:55.540] un tāpēc šo secību atklāšana nozīmē, ka viņiem ir vīrusu pierādījumi.
[04:55.540 –> 05:02.340] Trūkst soļi, kas parāda infekcioz daļiņu faktisko eksistenci
[05:02.340 –> 05:06.840] un to, ka sekvences nāk no šādu daļiņu iekšpuses.
[05:06.840 –> 05:11.640] Virologu loģiskā kļūda ir tikusi norādīta gadu desmitiem.
[05:11.640 –> 05:17.540] Piemēram, kopš 1990. gadiem Perth grupa ir parādījusi, ka apgalvotās
[05:17.540 –> 05:23.540] citētās HIV sekvences nekad netika parādīts, ka nāk no piedāvātajām HIV daļiņām.
[05:23.540 –> 05:28.740] Pēdējos gados daudzi no mums vēl vairāk esam norādījuši uz to pašu problēmu ar SARS-CoV-2
[05:28.740 –> 05:30.340] starp citām loģiskajām nepilnībām.
[05:30.340 –> 05:36.520] Apgalvotais vīruss neeksistē, jo apkopotajām sekvencēm nekad nav parādīts, ka tās ir vīrusiskas.
[05:36.960 –> 05:38.960] Ar HPV tas nav citādi.
[05:38.960 –> 05:45.320] Nav pierādījuma, ka sekvences nāk no entitātes, kas atbilst vīrusa definīcijai.
[05:45.640 –> 05:51.900] Pēc visiem rādītājiem, tās ir vienkārši cilvēka audos atrastās ģenētiskās sekvences variācijas.
[05:51.900 –> 05:56.400] Tā ir problēma, ar ko sastopamies pie ikvienam, kas apgalvo, ka slimības izraisoši vīrusi eksistē.
[05:56.400 –> 06:10.200] Viņi vēlas sākt sarunu ar viltus premisu, ka ģenētiskajās datubāzēs ir vīrusu pierādījumi un ka viņu filoģenētiskās koksnes parāda variantus un attīstošos patogēnus.
[06:10.200 –> 06:13.600] Tomēr tā ir fiktīvu konstruktu paradigma.
[06:13.600 –> 06:24.400] Grāmatā “Ardievas viroloģijai, formāla vīrusa modeļa noraidīšana”, mans vīrs Marks izmantoja SARS-CoV-2 piemēru, lai atklātu krāpšanu.
[06:24.400 –> 06:30.400] Sadaļā “Bruņurupuči līdz pat apakšai” viņš izklāstīja, kā citēto koronavīrusu
[06:30.400 –> 06:36.160] genomu pēdas ved atpakaļ pie 1980. gadu publikācijām, kas nesniedz pierādījumus, ka ģenētiskās
[06:36.160 –> 06:40.140] sekvences ir vīrusiskas izcelsmes, tāpat kā HPV.
[06:40.140 –> 06:43.920] Bet kā ar tiem attēliem, kas apgalvo, ka parāda HPV pierādījumus?
[06:43.920 –> 06:50.120] Piemēram, 1990. gadā pētnieku grupa ieguva ķirurģiski izņemtas kārpas, kas tika
[06:50.120 –> 06:52.920] homogenizētas un ultra-centrifugētas.
[06:52.920 –> 06:56.240] Elektronu mikrografijas attēls ir parādīts 1. attēlā,
[06:56.240 –> 06:59.920] kuru viņi apgalvo, ka pārstāv citētu “attīrītu HPV”.
[06:59.920 –> 07:04.220] Bet vai šīs it kā daļiņas tika parādīts, ka ir inficējošas vai slimības izraisošas?
[07:04.220 –> 07:05.220] Nē.
[07:05.220 –> 07:09.020] Tās tika uzskatītas par vīrusiskām, balstoties uz DNS sekvencēm,
[07:09.020 –> 07:11.220] kas atklātas caur hibridizāciju,
[07:11.220 –> 07:13.520] kuras problēmu es tikko apspriedu.
[07:13.520 –> 07:18.220] Viņi iesaistījās tālākā apļveida argumentācijā ar elektronu mikroskopijas antivielām reakcijām,
[07:18.220 –> 07:20.720] kas it kā ir specifiskas HPV.
[07:20.720 –> 07:24.720] Mēs varam redzēt, ka pat pēc viņu pašu noteikumiem viņiem šeit ir problēma,
[07:24.720 –> 07:29.220] jo viņu kontroles grupā, kas it kā nebija ar kārpām,
[07:29.220 –> 07:34.720] pusei pieaugušo subjektu arī bija pozitīvas antivielām reakcijas viņu asins paraugos.
[07:34.720 –> 07:38.220] Viņi negodbīgi iekļāva dažus zīdaiņus,
[07:38.220 –> 07:40.720] kuriem visiem nebija pozitīvu antivielām testu,
[07:40.720 –> 07:43.720] mēģinot uzlabot ciparu izskatu.
[07:43.720 –> 07:46.220] Tas ir nederīgs salīdzinājums,
[07:46.220 –> 07:49.880] jo jaunākie pacienti kārpu grupā bija 9 gadus veci.
[07:49.880 –> 07:55.880] Bez fakta, ka nav veida, kā šīs antivielām analīzes parāda specifiskumu,
[07:55.880 –> 07:59.680] pat pēc viņu paša noteikumiem, ar pētījumu ir vēl viena problēma.
[07:59.680 –> 08:03.180] Ja viņi apgalvoja, ka parāda vīrusus no kārpu paraugiem,
[08:03.180 –> 08:06.680] kur bija salīdzinošās elektronu mikrografijas?
[08:06.680 –> 08:11.980] Tas ir, paraugi, ņemti no veselās ādas un ādas ar citām slimībām.
[08:11.980 –> 08:16.980] Kad mēs atgriežamies pie metožu sadaļas, kur viņi apraksta pacientus un kontroles subjektus,
[08:16.980 –> 08:23.580] mēs redzam, ka kontroles serumi tika savākti no 6 veseliem zīdaiņiem vecumā no 6 līdz 12 mēnešiem
[08:23.580 –> 08:27.580] un no 18 laboratorijas darbiniekiem vecumā no 25 līdz 59 gadiem.
[08:27.580 –> 08:34.180] Citiem vārdiem, viņi ņēma tikai asins paraugus salīdzināšanai, ne ādas paraugus.
[08:34.180 –> 08:41.080] Tātad viņi nepārbaudīja, vai daļiņas, kas izskatās vienādi, var atrast arī bez kārpām.
[08:41.080 –> 08:46.280] Tātad jūs varat redzēt, ka šeit ir kārtu pēc kārtas trūkstošo pierādījumu.
[08:46.280 –> 08:50.400] Pat ja vizualizētās daļiņas ir saistītas ar kārpām,
[08:50.400 –> 08:55.360] nav pierādījuma, ka tās ir izraisošais elements.
[08:55.360 –> 08:58.240] It īpaši, ka tās būtu vīrusiskas.
[08:58.240 –> 09:02.520] Līdzīgi, ja atklātās DNS sekvences attiecas uz slimību,
[09:02.520 –> 09:05.280] vai tās ir kārpās vai dzemdes kakla vēzī,
[09:05.280 –> 09:09.960] atkal nav pierādījuma, ka šādas sekvences ir vīrusiskas izcelsmes.
[09:09.960 –> 09:17.100] Un antivielām analīzes ir tik nespecifiskas, ka tās ir farsiskas, pat pēc viņu pašu noteikumiem.
[09:17.100 –> 09:21.900] Kad mēs atgriežamies pie publikācijas “HPV testēšana primārajam dzemdes kakla skrīningam”,
[09:21.900 –> 09:25.860] tas norāda, ka dzemdes kakla skrīningam un slimības pārvaldībai
[09:25.860 –> 09:31.260] prioritāte ir infekciju atklāšana, kas saistītas ar bojājumiem vai bojājumu attīstību.
[09:31.260 –> 09:39.900] Tāpēc HPV tests nav strikti vīrusu tests, kur tiek godāta augsta analītiskā jutība,
[09:39.900 –> 09:42.760] bet drīzāk tests onkoloģiskā riska noteikšanai.
[09:42.760 –> 09:46.560] Šāda veida teikums var iespaidot tos, kas ir
[09:46.560 –> 09:49.360] naivi attiecībā uz viroloģijas krāpšanu,
[09:49.360 –> 09:53.220] bet var tikt noraidīts kā zinātnisks prasmīgums.
[09:53.220 –> 09:59.320] HPV tests nav strikti vīrusu tests jāsaprot kā
[09:59.320 –> 10:03.560] HPV tests nav un nekad nav bijis vīrusu tests.
[10:03.560 –> 10:08.160] Tā sauktajam vīrusu testam jāpārsniedz analītiskā jutība
[10:08.160 –> 10:12.660] un specifiskums ģenētiskām sekvencēm vai kādai citai it kā korelācijai.
[10:12.660 –> 10:16.460] Tomēr to nevar izdarīt, jo nav pierādījumu par to lietu,
[10:16.460 –> 10:18.960] pret kuru viņi apgalvo, ka validē secību.
[10:18.960 –> 10:22.960] Tas ir, faktiska infekcioza HPV daļiņa.
[10:22.960 –> 10:27.460] “Vīrusu mānijas” 8. nodaļā attiecībā uz dzemdes kakla vēzi
[10:27.460 –> 10:29.760] un it kā HPV eksistenci
[10:29.760 –> 10:33.760] mēs izklāstījām jautājumus, kurus uzdavām DKFZ,
[10:33.760 –> 10:37.160] kas angļu valodā pazīstams kā Vācijas Vēža pētījumu centrs.
[10:37.160 –> 10:39.200] Mēs rakstījām:
[10:39.200 –> 10:42.700] “Vai mēs patiešām varam ticēt vīrusu detekcijas metodēm?”
[10:42.700 –> 10:47.600] DKFZ nosūtīja mums citētu “brīnišķīgu literatūras sarakstu”,
[10:47.600 –> 10:51.760] kurā bija divi pētījumi, abi veikti Zuhausen et al.
[10:51.760 –> 10:58.360] kas, viņi apgalvo, kalpo kā pierādījumi specifiska HPV pirmajai izolācijai no dzemdes kakla vēža audiem.
[10:58.360 –> 11:05.060] Pirmais no šiem diviem rakstiem, publicēts 1983. gadā žurnālā Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
[11:05.060 –> 11:08.860] “Papilomas vīrusa DNS no dzemdes kakla karcinomas
[11:08.860 –> 11:13.260] un tās izplatība vēža biopsijas paraugos no dažādiem ģeogrāfiskiem reģioniem”
[11:13.260 –> 11:16.060] trūkst šādas kritiski svarīgas lietas:
[11:16.060 –> 11:21.660] Nav skaidrs, no kurienes nāk klonētā it kā vīrusa DNS.
[11:21.660 –> 11:24.460] Nezinot DNS izcelsmi,
[11:24.460 –> 11:27.460] nav iespējams pierādīt, ka tur bija vīruss.
[11:27.460 –> 11:31.660] Liels skaits dzemdes kakla audzēju tika skrīnēts bez panākumiem,
[11:31.660 –> 11:37.200] palielinot iespēju, ka viena audzēja ar šo DNS atklāšana ir tikai sakritība.
[11:37.200 –> 11:40.820] Autori izmanto terminu “ne-stingrī apstākļi”,
[11:40.820 –> 11:45.860] kas, iespējams, nozīmē, ka hibridizācija notika ar mazāk nekā perfektu atbilstību.
[11:45.860 –> 11:50.760] Tas ir, divas DNS ķēdes, kuras viņi izmantoja, nebija identiskas.
[11:50.760 –> 11:55.780] Protams, viņi vienkārši teiktu, ka vīrusi ātri mutē, norāda Deivids Krovs.
[11:55.780 –> 11:57.760] Bet tas ir tīrs spekulācijas.
[11:57.760 –> 12:02.260] Mēs uzsvērām vairākas citas bažas DKFZ
[12:02.260 –> 12:05.860] par šiem apgalvotajiem pamata HPV rakstiem
[12:05.860 –> 12:09.760] un prasījām viņiem skaidrojumu, bet viņi nekad neatbildēja.
[12:09.760 –> 12:13.760] Un pat ja viņi patiesībā uzskata, ka HPV eksistē,
[12:13.760 –> 12:18.060] apgalvojums, ka tas izraisa dzemdes kakla vēzi, ir absurds.
[12:18.060 –> 12:22.560] Viņu pašu paradigmas ietvaros epidemioloģija atklāj,
[12:22.560 –> 12:26.960] ka tikai aptuveni 0,1% no sievietēm, kas it kā
[12:26.960 –> 12:31.960] citēti “inficētas ar HPV”, galu galā attīsta dzemdes kakla vēzi.
[12:31.960 –> 12:36.460] Tātad nav brīnums, ka CDC norāda, ka nav veida, kā zināt,
[12:36.460 –> 12:39.960] kurš attīstīs vēzi vai citas veselības problēmas no HPV.
[12:39.960 –> 12:45.160] Tie no mums, kas esam izskatījuši cauri virologu metodoloģijām,
[12:45.160 –> 12:50.360] var viņiem palīdzēt ar viņu dilemmu un norādīt, ka tieši neviens no viņiem
[12:50.360 –> 12:54.960] nesaņems šos stāvokļus no fiktīva izgudrojuma, kam nav zinātnisku pamatu.
[12:54.960 –> 13:01.460] Šajā brīdī mēs varam redzēt, ka viņiem nav pierādījumu, ka daļiņa, kas atbilst vīrusa aprakstam, faktiski eksistē.
[13:01.460 –> 13:09.660] Ja daļiņa nav parādīta kā eksistējoša, nevar būt veida, kā validēt jebkādus testus, kas it kā atklāj šādu daļiņu.
[13:09.660 –> 13:15.960] Tātad nevar būt veida, kā parādīt, ka kāds ir citēti inficēts ar šīm daļiņām
[13:15.960 –> 13:19.960] vai ka tās izplatās starp cilvēkiem vai ka tās izraisa jebkādas veselības problēmas.
[13:19.960 –> 13:25.300] Diemžēl lielākā daļa cilvēku neapskatīs neko no tā un tā vietā teiks:
[13:25.300 –> 13:30.260] “Jā, bet ir vakcīna, tātad kā viņi var izveidot vakcīnu bez vīrusa?”
[13:30.260 –> 13:34.960] Tas ir vecākais triks grāmatā un ir ticis minēts kopš Edvards Dženers publicēja
[13:34.960 –> 13:42.460] “Pētījums par variola vakcīnas jeb govs bakas cēloņiem un efektiem” 1798. gadā.
[13:42.460 –> 13:46.760] Kā Maiks Stouns rakstīja savā visaptverošajā rakstā par Dženera darbībām,
[13:46.760 –> 13:48.760] ko es saišu raidījuma piezīmēs.
[13:48.760 –> 13:51.460] Šīs inokulatīcijas ietver strupstu ņemšanu
[13:51.460 –> 13:54.260] no inficētiem govs baku cietušo krievēm,
[13:54.260 –> 13:57.960] vesela subjekta ādas pārgriešanu ar lancetu
[13:57.960 –> 14:01.260] un šī nešķīstā materiāla izkliedēšanu brūcē.
[14:01.260 –> 14:03.760] Ja viņi attīstītu slimību un atveseļotos,
[14:03.760 –> 14:07.260] viņi tad tiktu uzskatīti par imūniem pret baku.
[14:07.260 –> 14:11.260] HPV vakcīnas ir balstītas uz sarežģītāku biotehnoloģiju,
[14:11.260 –> 14:14.760] lai gan tā pati netīrā prakse ievadīt
[14:14.760 –> 14:17.880] ar slimībām saistītus produktus ķermenī saglabājas.
[14:17.880 –> 14:20.500] Farmaceitiskie preparāti, piemēram, Gardasil vakcīna,
[14:20.500 –> 14:25.220] satur dažādus proteīnus, kas it kā nāk no HPV daļiņām.
[14:25.220 –> 14:29.100] Tādiem pašiem iemesliem, kurus tikko apspriedu attiecībā uz DNS sekvencēm,
[14:29.100 –> 14:31.300] tas ir krāpniecisks apgalvojums,
[14:31.300 –> 14:34.980] jo šie proteīni nekad nav parādīti kā piederīgi jebkuram vīrusam.
[14:34.980 –> 14:39.380] Galvenās strāvas teorija apgalvo, ka šie antigēniskie proteīni vakcīnā
[14:39.380 –> 14:41.760] sagatavos citēto imūnsistēmu,
[14:41.760 –> 14:45.020] lai aizstāvētos pret it kā vīrusiem nākotnē.
[14:45.020 –> 14:49.480] Realitātē injekcija izraisīs iekaisuma reakciju,
[14:49.480 –> 14:51.980] kas ir pēdējā lieta, kas ķermenim nepieciešama.
[14:51.980 –> 14:57.980] It kā nav pietiekami muļķīgi ievadīt nevēlamus svešus proteīnus ķermenī,
[14:57.980 –> 15:03.860] Gardasil nāk ar papildu toksiskumu 500 mikrogramu alumīnija veidā
[15:03.860 –> 15:07.060] jeb, kā mūsu ASV draugi saka, aluminum.
[15:07.060 –> 15:12.200] Alumīnijs ir smagais metāls, un cilvēka ķermenim nav vajadzības pēc tā.
[15:12.200 –> 15:17.300] Iemesls, kāpēc to pievieno vakcīnām, ir apgalvojums, ka tas rada spēcīgāku
[15:17.300 –> 15:19.200] citēto imūnresponsi.
[15:19.200 –> 15:24.040] Es aplūkošu, kāpēc tas ir eifēmisms tam, kas patiešām notiek, gaidāmajā video,
[15:24.040 –> 15:27.400] kas fokusēsies uz alumīniju un vakcīnām.
[15:27.400 –> 15:32.240] Ir pietiekami slikti uzņemt alumīniju no piesārņotiem vides avotiem,
[15:32.240 –> 15:36.340] bet ir daudz sliktāk tikt injicētam ar alumīniju,
[15:36.340 –> 15:39.840] jo tas apiet dažus ķermeņa attīrīšanas mehānismus.
[15:39.840 –> 15:46.040] Faktiski pat ASV Veselības un cilvēku pakalpojumu departamenta 2008. gada publikācija
[15:46.040 –> 15:48.940] “Toksikoloģiskais profils alumīnijam”
[15:48.940 –> 15:53.940] norāda, ka alumīnija kuņģa-zarnu trakta absorbcija ir zema,
[15:53.940 –> 15:58.440] parasti 0,1 līdz 0,4% diapazonā cilvēkiem.
[15:58.440 –> 16:01.840] Tātad vairāk nekā 99% no tā netiek absorbēti
[16:01.840 –> 16:04.340] un izdalās tieši ar izkārnījumiem.
[16:04.340 –> 16:12.340] No otras puses, lielākā daļa injicētā alumīnija nonāks smadzenēs un kaulos,
[16:12.340 –> 16:18.340] potenciāli uzstādot laika bumbas šajās jomās slimības vēlākai izpausmei.
[16:18.340 –> 16:22.340] Kombinācijā ar citām vakcīnām daudzu bērnu vakcināciju grafikā
[16:22.340 –> 16:30.340] ir acīmredzams, ka Gardasil ir pievienojis papildu toksiskumu un kumulatīvo alumīnija slogu.
[16:30.340 –> 16:37.340] Lielākajai daļai vecāku, protams, nav ne jausmas, ka viņi pakļauj savus bērnus šādai smagā metāla indēšanai.
[16:37.340 –> 16:43.340] Tātad šis ir gala rezultāts stāstā, kas radīts ap HPV.
[16:43.340 –> 16:52.340] Toksiska vakcīna, kas uzspiestu nenojaušošai populācijai par citētu vīrusu, kas nekad nav parādīts kā eksistējošs.
[16:52.340 –> 16:55.340] Kārpas gandrīz universāli ir pašierobežojošas.
[16:55.340 –> 16:59.840] Un, lai būtu atklāta, man vēl nav redzēts labs skaidrojums to cēlonim.
[16:59.840 –> 17:04.640] Tas vienkārši var būt ķermeņa veids, kā norobežot nevēlamu toksīnu.
[17:04.640 –> 17:09.640] Mēs zinām no dzīvnieku pētījumiem, kuros citēti papilomas vīrusi tiek vaināti,
[17:09.640 –> 17:14.640] ka kārpaini bojājumi tiek izraisīti tikai vispirms traumatizējot ādu.
[17:14.640 –> 17:19.640] Dienas beigās, neskatoties uz visām dažādajām metodēm, kas tiek izmantotas pret kārpām,
[17:19.640 –> 17:21.640] tās mēdz atrisināties pašas.
[17:21.640 –> 17:27.640] Attiecībā uz dzemdes kakla vēzi, fiktīvais HPV noteikti nav cēlonis.
[17:27.640 –> 17:34.200] Bet pat tie, kas uzskata, ka ir šāds vīruss, nevar parādīt iekšēju konsekvenci ar savu modeli.
[17:34.200 –> 17:38.600] Es veltīšu nākamo video dzemdes kakla vēža tēmai,
[17:38.600 –> 17:44.520] kā arī maldinošajiem uztriepjumiem, kas rezultējas visādās nevajadzīgās intervencēs.
[17:44.520 –> 17:52.200] Ar jebkuru no šīm veselības tēmām jūsu labākā izvēle nav cīnīties pret slimību, bet praktizēt labu veselību.
[17:52.200 –> 17:58.300] Šajā ziņā jūs varat pārbaudīt visus resursus, ko mēs nodrošinām bez maksas drsambailey.com
[17:58.300 –> 18:04.300] Lūdzu, arī apsveriet iegūt manas grāmatas “Terrain Therapy” eksemplāru visaptverošai informācijai
[18:04.300 –> 18:08.400] ne tikai par medicīnisku testu un vakcīnu izvairīšanos, bet par daudz ko vairāk.
[18:08.400 –> 18:12.400] Pareiza domāšana un pareiza dzīvošana ir katra cilvēka sasniedzamībā,
[18:12.400 –> 18:15.300] un es ceru, ka jūs turpināsiet šo ceļojumu kopā ar mani.
[18:22.200 –> 18:28.900] Ar labu nakti.
Tulkojums izveidots lietojot vairākas tehnoloģijas ieskaitot: Whisper, Claude un ChatGPT.
Responses